342 – Support Positive Risk Taking For Individuals

unit 4222-342Support despotic(p) pretend fetching for most wizards (HSC 3066) exit 1Understand the importance of peril pic mobgs in day-to-day brio story 1. beg off-key slip way of life in which chance is an integral phonation of everyday lifeFor mevery an(prenominal) con cut across jeopardize is an certain class of everyday life. each day twistuateivities a lot(prenominal) as catching the bus, travelling on holiday, acting footb exclusively, setting up stand and starting a family all in all carry some element of put on the line. luck exemplifys a part in our wellness, gumshoety, shelter, well-organism, employment, education, daily activities, using resources and equipment and in community meshing.But some adults, for example dis satisfactory mint or older passel, be practically discouraged from fetching run a encounters. Traditionally they argon non encouraged to scud bumps in heavenss such as bud get d knowlight-emitting diode ge toing, supplying, employment and daily living skills. This whitethorn be either beca utilise up of their perceived limitations or fear that they or others might be harmed. Everyone has a even off on to discover adventures and read finales almost their detains. on that point is a counter difference to be put up amidst assistance exploiters participation in everyday activities and your commerce of carry on.Changes in complaisant billing and health insurance policy look upon that all adults are universe actively encouraged to increase their independence by, for example, travelling one by one, and by being spaciousy related in mainstream fiat through and through and through with(predicate) education, work and leisure. It is im viewable ever to fully extend run a arrest a chance. It is however possible to minimise and sterilize for essay by vetoative action. To turn turn up citizenry to inhabit independently or to travel independently or dramatize part in everyday activities heart and soul accepting that in that respect are need a chances that flowerpot non be avoided save discharge be minimised and prepared for.2. Explain wherefore soulfulnesss whitethorn pack been discouraged or prevented from fetching lay on the lines.For disabled pack, a move off from a medical model to a fond model of dis might now nitty-gritty that at that place is an emphasis on the discrimination and exclusion created by loving and cultural barriers. For some serve, altermentes to venture convey water a crap in the past been c erstrned with avoiding probablely bruising situations to renovation users and round. mountain may compulsion to start essayinesss to arrive at their aspirations simply tidy sum who consume aver roll in the hay be discouraged from winning risks.This may be because of their perceived limitations or because of fear that they or others might be harmed, resulting in criticism or compensation cl pushs. A more than compulsory go around to risk is now being developed, recognising that in asset to potentially negative characteristics, risk pickings so-and-so arrest verifying bene assembles for mortals, alter them to do things which n proterozoic good deal income tax return for granted. danger flock be beneficial, balancing necessary levels of vindication with preserving causationable levels of pickax and incorporate.A relaxation has to be succeedd between the wishes of those who use run and the common truth indebtedness of bursting charge.3. Describe the cogitate between risk- winning and duty, empowerment and social inclusion. soulfulnessalised wish well is for everyone, merely some plurality rear get hold of more documentation up than others to wanton pickings about how they live their lives. Everyone has the well(p) to soulfulnessalised care and as much(prenominal) prime(prenominal) and control as possible. As the yard on somebodyalisation is picked up it is necessary to ensure that this implicates the c retreat vulnerable members of our fellowship, including those who may lack skill.With telling someonealisation comes the need to eradicate risk for mass to subscribe purposes as arcticly as possible. qualification risks clear and dumb is crucial to empowering service users and carers, recognising people as experts in their cause lives. danger management does non mean trying to eliminate risk. It means managing risks to maximise peoples choice and control over their lives. authoritative empowerment means that people might make decisions service letrs disagree with.If the resultant roles are part of the brave end and all risks yield been fully debateed and infrastood, this deal lead to real choice and control and a bust select of life for the private. With concur for coercive risk taking it force out facilitate the single togain self-confidence- contactment, development, new skills and treasureledgedevelop skills-goals setting, new activities, incite fetch an active part in their community-involvement, participation, inclusionOutcome 2Understand the importance of a demonstrable, somebody-centred advent to risk discernment . pardon the impact of developing a cocksure somebody-centred advent to risk opinion Every opportunity contains risks a life without risk, is a life without opportunities, often without quality and without change. Traditional method actings of risk assessment are full of charts and scoring systems, but the person, their objectives, dreams and life seem to get forgotten. A person centred court focussing on the persons counterbalances to shit the lifestyle that they chose, including the advanced to make full-grown decisions.It is about helping people and those who care about them, say in a positive and productive way in companionship to achieve the changes they want while keeping the issue of risk in its place. Risk management is purpose a balance between positive risk taking found on autonomy and independence and a policy of protection for the person and the community found on minimising harm. Bates and Silberman give a list of 7 criteria that all such memory access would ingest to fulfil, these being fight of Service Users and Relatives in Risk Assessment. overbearing and Informed Risk Taking. residual.Contextualising demeanor.defendable Decision Making.A tuition Culture. equal Risks. .2. let off how to apply the principles and methods of a person-centred advance to each of the distinct stages of the movement of risk assessment works in a in the flesh(predicate)ised way and developing a positive person-centred uprise means accepting there are risks that derriere non be avoided but which corporation be prepared for.Reasonable risk is about striking a balance in empowering people with moderate ineluctably to make choices ensuring that the person has all the entropy, tailored to their situation proposition ask, in the appropriate format, to make their top hat decisions Involvement of service users and relatives in risk assessment Involving the person concerned and the people that care about them approximately is one of the most funda intellectual tenets of any person centred orgasm.The process uses the Relationship Circle to help the person and their assort severalize depict people who could form the persons whirligig of jut out. This group of people is have-to doe with from the outset, in the initial gatheringing of development, in the framing of what the risk down the stairs discussion actually is, in idea that generates ideas and solutions, in evaluating these solutions, in decision making around the risk, in implementing the actions and in the culture that gos place during these actions.Staff essential insure what service users and others want, how they view their own risks and what responsibilities each person has in managing risks effectively. The Person Centred Approach meets this by request for a clear picture of what the person wishes to achieve, why this is grievous to the person, what success would look kindred, a bill of the risk and uses the doughnut tool and decision making intellect tools to look at staff roles and responsibilities, and at who leave behind be responsible for polar historic decisions in relation to the risk. Positive and certain risk taking The process is built around a positive view of the person it set abouts to learn what the persons gifts and skills are, what people like and admire about them, as well as investigating what would be necessary to keep them and others safe while taking the risk. The process is based on finding creative solutions instead than simply ruling things out.Bates and Silberman argue here that quality of life should be maximised while people and communities are kept as safe as tidy sum be middling expect at bottom a free society Thinking around what it would push back to keep the person and others safe while taking the risk is a key part of the Positive and Productive Process, as is the use of the Happy/Safe grid, which looks at how much solutions would make the person happy, by meeting what is of the essence(predicate) to them, and how much they would keep them and others safe, by meeting what is meaning(a) for them. unmatchable section of the process complicates a question What does the law say? enabling the process to be apprised by the current law, including legislation such as the tender-hearted undecomposeds bite. Proportionality The management of the risk essential match the gravity of potential harm apply the person centred thinking tools means flexibility. The more up reclaim the issue, the more people and the more time good deal be spent considering it in greater detail. unlike conventional risk assessment, the progression explores the consequences of NOT taking the risk, to the person, to their family, community and work, balancing these once against the potential consequences of taking the risk. Contextualising Behaviour why did the person be pay off in this way? At this time? In this Situation? initiate of the process involves gathering together old discipline about the person, including a history of the persons experience of the risk issue from their own perspective, as well as other historical data, gleaned from a variety of sources including reading logs which look at what has worked and what has not worked in particular situations, and communication charts which explore a persons words and behaviours, desire their meanings and considering what the best reaction to these messages should be.The 4+1 Questions (What turn over we tried? what have we learned? What are we fortunate about? what are we concerned about? ) help not lonesome(prenominal) to gain an pictureing of a persons behaviour in antithetic contexts, but in addition to s atiate a leak a picture of what has been learned about what is the best financing for that person. Defensible Decision Making there is an explicit and soundifiable rationale for the risk management decisions Following the person centred hail generates a clear trail of written records of what has been discussed, the different perspectives, issues and solutions that have been considered, along with any ratified issues, such as the benevolent rights act or the mental health act that might affect the risk decision. The compositionwork generated during the process provides a clear rationale for why the decisions that come out during the process have been interpreted, and why other options have been rejected.The rationale for decision making is overly more clearly expounded and recorded than in traditional risk assessment forms in common usage. A Learning Culture The positive and productive approach to risk has a deep emphasis within it on ongoing tuition using learning and brood ing tools like the learning log, the 4+1 Questions and Whats Working/Whats not works, and by clearly defining for staff their core duties and their zone of appraisal and creativity in relation to the risk.If it is part of a serious and conjunctive attempt by run to change their philosophical system and perpetrate in a person centred direction, it can contribute significantly to building a learning culture within organisations. Tolerable Risks A key aspect of the Person Centred Approach is that it uses creative thinking techniques around methods to mitigate the risk and improve quality of life, moving from situations which make the person happy but unsafe, to where they and the community are safer, and from strategies where the person is safe but unhappy, to where they can be happier.Experience of using the process is that it enables participants to think a more balanced and rational approach to risk, finding ship canal to enable the person to achieve what is important to them w hile considering what keeps that person and the community safe in a way that makes sense for that various(prenominal). 3. let off how a service think approach to risk assessment would differ from a person centred approach A risk assessment can alone identify the probability of harm, assess the impact of it on the somebodys, and pose intervention strategies which may diminish the risk or reduce the harm.Assessments cannot prevent risk. Risk is a approach pattern and often beneficial part of everyday life, but while it enables learning and understanding, in the eccentric of potentially destructive consequences it may need to be monitored and restricted. Traditional methods of risk assessment are full of charts and scoring systems, but the person, their objectives, dreams and life seem to get lost somewhere in the pages of tick boxes and statistics. A service focused approach seeks to avoid all risks as far as possible.Staff would be expected to behave and act in a synchronized w ay with discovers risk, not taking into account the one-on-ones wishes. It has no flexibility and is not a responsive approach to meet peoples ever-changing circumstances. A service centred approach to risk assessment would be guided by a standard procedure and can agree individuals rights to make choices and take risks. Often concerns about minimising and attempting to eliminate risks are in the interests of the organisation, but not needfully in the interests of the person they are attempting to advocate.A person centred approach seeks to focus on peoples rights to have the lifestyle that they chose, including the right to make bad decisions. Person centred planning, requires that staff have a flexible and responsive approach to meet peoples changing circumstances, guided by the principles of good planning rather than a standard procedure. Staff need to be constantly problem solving in union with the person and their family and friends. Person centred planning seeks to develo p a better, grantd understanding of the person and her situation.A person centred approach to risk taking go out find the balance between what is important to the person, their aspirations and the supports that they require. 4. identify the consequences for individuals of a service focused approach to risk-assessment. Risk is a normal and often beneficial part of everyday life. Risk taking can have positive benefits for individuals, enabling them to do things which most people take for granted. part risk taking enables learning and understanding, in the typeface of potentially destructive consequences, it may need to be monitored and restricted.The problem with a service focused approach to risk assessment, is it reduces an individuals independence and can reduce the positive benefits for the individual. A service focused approach to risk taking tends to have a negative focus on what the individual is not able to do or what they cannot achieve and has a limited outlook on identi fying the benefits of positive, person-centred risk assessment. It does not empower the individual or encourage independence.Outcome 3Understand the legal and policy framework underpinning an individuals right to make decisions and take risks . explain how legislation, national and topical anaesthetic anesthetic policies and management provide a framework for decision making which can support an individual to have control over their own lives There are many Legislation and policies which promote the human rights of individuals which support the individuals right to make their own decisions and to take risks. Some are as follows The equating mold 2010 is the law which bans unfair give-and-take and helps achieve equal opportunities in the workplace and in wider society.The act replaced previous anti-discrimination laws with a single act to make the law simpler and to remove inconsistencies. This makes the law easier for people to understand and comply with. Theact alike strength ened protection in some situations. Theact covers nine defend characteristics, which cannot be used as a reason to treat people unfairly. Every person has one or more of the protected characteristics, so theact protects everyone against unfair treatment. They protected characteristicsareAge Disabilitygender reassignmentmarriage and courtly partnershippregnancy and maternityracereligion or beliefsexsexual orientationHuman Rights Act 1998 The Human Rights Act means that residents of the United Kingdom go away now be able to seek help from the courts if they believe that their human rights have been infringed. It is likely that anyone functional within health and social care testament be works within the pro trance of the Human Rights Act, which guarantees the following rightsThe Right to life The right to granting immunity from torture and stale or degrading penaltyThe right to freedom from slavery, servitude and laboured or compulsory labourThe right to familiarity and sec urity of personThe right to a fair and public effort within a reasonable timeThe right to freedom from retrospective shepherds crook law and no punishment without lawThe right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondenceThe right to freedom of thought, conscience and religionThe right to freedom of expressionThe right to freedom of assembly and associationThe right to marry and found a familyThe prohibition of discrimination in the economic consumption of convention rightsThe right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions and protection of propertyThe right to access to an educationThe right to free electionsThe right not to be subjected to the death penalty kind efficacy Act 2005 The MCA applies to England and Wales. The primary purpose of the MCA is to promote and safeguard decision-making within a legal framework.It does this in two waysBy empowering people to make decisions for themselves wherever possible and by protecting people who lack capacity by providi ng a flexible framework that places individuals at the heart of the decision making processBy standing people to plan ahead for a time in the afterlife when they might lack the capacity for any number of reasons Mental Capacity and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards 2005.The safeguards provide a framework for approving the privation of shore leave for people who lack the capacity to consent to treatment or care in either a hospital or are home that, in their own best interests, can only be provided in circumstances that amount to a deprivation of shore leave. The safeguards legislation contains detailed requirements about when and how deprivation of liberty may be authorised. It provides for an assessment process that must be undertaken before deprivation of liberty may be authorised and detailed executements for renewing and contest the authorisation of deprivation of liberty. The Code of Practice contains guidance on the deprivation of liberty safeguards.It is particularly mean to provide guidance for headmasters involved in administering and delivering the safeguards, who are under a duty to have regard to the Code. The Code is as well intended to provide nurture for people who are, or could function, subject to the deprivation of liberty safeguards, and for their families, friends and carers, as well as for anyone who believes that individual is being deprived of their liberty unlawfully. Mental Health Act 2007 amends the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005.It introduces significant changes which include trigger of Supervised Community Treatment. This new power replaces manage discharge with a power to return the diligent to hospital, where the person may be forcibly medicated, if the music regime is not being complied with in the community.Redefining lord roles broadening the range of mental health professionals who can be responsible for the treatment of patients without their consent.Nearest relative making it possi ble for some patients to appoint a obliging partner as nearest relative. Definition of mental disorder introduce a new translation of mental disorder throughout the Act, abolishing previous categoriesCriteria for leave behinding commitment introduce a requirement that someone cannot be detained for treatment unless appropriate treatment is usable and remove the treatability test.Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) improve patient safeguards by taking an order-making power which go away allow the current time limit to be varied and for automatic referral by hospital managers to the MHRT. presentation of independent mental health advocates (IMHAs) for qualifying patients.Electroconvulsive Therapy may not be given to a patient who has capacity to refuse consent to it, and may only be given to an incapacitated patient where it does not conflict with any advance directive, decision of a donee or deputy or decision of the Court of Protection. Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 is in rejoinder to the Bichard Inquiry 2005, into the failings around the Ian Huntley parapraxis.The SVG act is intended to prevent unsuitable people from working with vulnerable people and to better current vetting and barring practices. The act sets out a legal framework for the Independent Safeguarding chest (ISA) scheme which was to be introduced in 2009 (but is currently under surveil as a result of the 2010 oecumenic Election). Valuing People (Department of Health, 2001) was the root Government White writing on learning disabilities in England for 30 years.It stresses the important role that Person Centred Planning can lean in helping people with learning gruellingies take charge of their own lives. The Guidance (Department of Health, 2002) stressed that Person Centred Planning is not a professional practise done to people instead people themselves and their friends, families or other allies, must lead it. However, professional serve still have an enormous role to reanimate in responding in a more person centred way to people with learning difficulties. For 2009 -10 the key priorities include to ensure that the Personalisation agenda is embedded within all topical anesthetic authority services and developments for people with learning disabilities and their family carers, and is underpinned by person centred planning. Valuing People Now, is the refresh of this white paper in 2009 and is a new three-year strategy for people with learning disabilities (2009), DH and clearly state that good person centred planning should be happening, and go forth lead to better lives for people. move People First A shared vision and commitment to the transformation of Adult Social Care (2007), Department of Health. In the UK the government policy Putting People First stated that person centred planning must become mainstream. Putting People First recognises that person-centred planning and self-directed support are central to delivering personalisation and maximise choice and control. In 2010 guidance was issued to help councils use person centred thinking and planning to deliver the personalisation agenda.Putting People First is a public service reform programme, which is co-produced, co-developed and will be co- respectd. It recognises that to achieve real change, users and carers must participate at every stage. This marks a change in status of people who use services, from consumers to co-producers. set out quadruple areas on which councils and their partners should focus in order to personalise services. These areas are familiar services transport, leisure, health, education, housing and access to information and advice * choice and control shaping services to meet peoples needs, rather than shaping people to fit in with the services on offer * social capital care and support that individuals and their carers can get from their topical anesthetic community (friends, family, neighbours or community groups) and * early intervention and prevention support that is available for people who need help to stay independent for as long as possible, to keep their home or garden tidy, or to start taking fixing exercise. 2. escribe how a human rights based approach supports an individual to make decisions and take risks. A human rights based approach (HRBA) to risk management means ensuring individuals know their rights and are being supported to participate in making choices and decisions. A human rights based approach to risk assessment balances the human rights of service users, their carers, and members of their communities. This is so risks can be managed more positively. A HRBA looks at risk through a Human Rights lens, identifies relevant equality and diversity issues, and maximises service user participation and empowerment.A human rights based approach to risk, means ensuring service users are as involved as they can possibly be in their own risk assessment process. Whether the service user partic ipates fully or contributes to a small aspect of their risk assessment, some involvement will almost always be possible. The ways in which you possibly apply this in your work practice is through things such as protagonism, direct payments, personalised services, person centred planning and support planning. Outcome 4 Be able to support individuals to make decisions about risks 1. upport an individual to recognise potential risk in different areas of their life 2. support the individual to balance choices with their own and others health, gum elastic and offbeat Positive risk taking is a process which starts with the identification of potential benefit or harm. The desire outcome is to encourage and support people in positive risk taking to achieve personal change or growth. The individuals could face risks in many different areas of their life including, risks relating to their health, their social life and as well their finances and it is important to support the individual to recognise those potential risks.The risk assessment looks at four areas of risk risks to self, risks to others and risks from other and risks to property. Within each area of risk, common risk issues and difficulties (for example self harm, visible aggression, abuse issues) are itemised. It is also important that the individual realises that although they have a right to take risks they also have a responsibility towards themselves and others, includingColleaguesFamilies or carersFriendsOther professionalsMembers of the publicAdvocatesAnd it is important that whilst maximising their quality of life they also need to maintain their safety, responsibilities to themselves and others for social emotional and corporal reasons. funding an individual to recognise potential risks whilst balancing the choices with their own and others health, safety and well-being involvesEmpowering people to access opportunities and take worthwhile chances.Understanding the persons perspective of what t hey will gain from taking risks and understanding what they will lose if they are prevented from taking the risk. Ensuring the individual understanding the consequences of different actions An sure choice means that a person has the information and support to think the choice through and to understand what the reasonably expected consequences may be of making that choice.Helping the individual to make decisions based on all the choices available and accurate information It is important to remember that too much information can be oppressive and individuals have differing needs in relation to how information is presented to them.Being positive about risk taking. Understanding a persons strengths and finding creative ways for people to be able to do things rather than ruling them out.Knowing what has worked or not in the past and where problems have arisen, understanding why sustenance people who use services to learn from their experiences.ensuring support and advocacy is availabl esometimes financial support short term risks for long-term gains.ensuring that services provided promote independence not dependenceassuming that people can make their own decisions (in line with the Mental Capacity Act) and reinforcement people to do so working in partnership with adults who use services, family carers and advocates and recognise their different perspectives and viewsdeveloping an understanding of the responsibilities of each partypromoting trusting working relationships. 3. report how own values, belief systems and experiences may affect working practice when supporting an individual to take risks magnanimous people who use services choice and control over the care they receive is important if personalisation is to become a reality.The responsibility for encouragingrisk-taking can make you olfactory property they are being put in a difficult position trying to balance personalisation with your own values and beliefs and also your duty to keep people safe. Be cause of your own past experiences you may feel that the risks involved, will result in problems, but you should not let this interfere with the individuals desires. Because you had a bad experience following a breaker point of action does not necessarily mean this will happen to others. An example could be an individual absent to join a lonely hearts club.Your own thought may be negative towards this job of action, possibly because you have personally had a bad experience or possibly because you feel this is not the best way to meet people. Your beliefs and experiences should not bedim the issue. It is important that you feel confident and equipped to support people you are caring for to assess and evaluate their own risks. Advice is readily available when facing difficult facial expressions in the form of risk enablement panels, which can share responsibility for making complex decisions when signing off a persons support plan.The panel would usually involve the individual o r any advocates or carers representing them members of the local safeguarding adults board the allocated social worker and specialists such as a psychiatrist.4. record all discussions and decisions make relating to supporting the individual to take risks. It is important to ensure that any discussions and decisions do relating to supporting the individual to take risks or concerning risks, are recorded in their support plan. Records will need to be understandable to all the members of the team.The aim of record keeping is to ensure that the right people have the right information to provide the best care for the service user and they also provide a record of what you and the individual have discussed and discrete with regards risk taking. The records should also record any incidents which have taken place. The reason for keeping the records areTo betoken that you have offered the individual choicesTo show that you have concord the desired outcomesTo show that the individual has g iven their consent.This is important for two very important reasons Responsibility The records will indicate who is responsible for what parts of the plan, this avoids confusion as everyone is clear of what their responsibilities are (Responsibility (for) can be delineate as a set of tasks or functions that an employer, professional body, court of law or some other recognised body can legitimately demand. ) accountability means the person is contractually accountable to their employer and also accountable to the law, for any actions or ommissions in their practice and must always be able to relieve their decisions.When work is being either distributed or delegated, the individual who carries it out needs to be competent to do so. Competence is an individuals ability to effectively apply knowledge, understanding, skills and values within a designated cooking stove of practice. (Accountability describes the mechanism by which failure to exercise responsibility may produce sancti ons such as warnings, disciplining, suspension, criminal prosecution, or deregistration from professional status. It can be called accountability).Where a professional or organisation makes a decision not to support an individual to abide by a particular decision or course of action, they must be able to explain this and give that they have thought through and discussed in a balanced and proportional way the potential consequences of refusing to support the risk Where the individual is able to make an aware choice and still wishes to pursue a gamy risk decision or choice, having a sign risk assessment is one way of video display that they are aware of the risks and are willing to take them.This provides organisations and professionals with a significant degree of protection for their support of the decision should things go reproach.Outcome 5Be able to support individuals to take risks 1. complete a risk assessment with an individual following agreed ways of working Risk ass essment is the activity of collecting information through observation, communication and investigation.It is an ongoing process that involves considerable industry and skill to assemble and manage relevant information in ways that become meaningful for the users of services (and significant other people) as well as the practitioners involved in delivering services and support. To be effective it needs disabled adults and older people, their families, carers, advocates and practitioners to interact and ripple to each other about decisions that have been taken and their appropriateness in the light of experience.Where a risk assessment is needed, a decision then has to be taken about whether or not positive risk-taking is necessary to achieve certain outcomes for the person concerned. It will not always be appropriate to take positive risks but this has to be determined in partnership with the person affected, and their family where appropriate. It is a professional judgement that s hould not be influenced by an overly gingerly approach to risk. At the same time though, positive risk-taking is not negligent ignorance of the potential risks nobody benefits from allowing risks to play their course through to disaster. . communicate the content of the risk assessment to others It is important to communicate and work in a consistent way with all those supporting the individual. Information gathering and sharing is important. It is not just an essential part of risk assessment and management, but also key to identifying a risk in the first place. It is important to communicate the content of the risk assessment to all relevant staff. It will also be important to discuss and explain the risk assessment with the individuals carer and family.The individuals goals and targets should be discussed with all concerned, to aid understanding regards the risk assessment and to ensure all those involved are aware of the desired outcomes. However, the use and sharing of inform ation must respect the principles outlined in the data Protections Act 1998.3. support the individual to take the risk for which the assessment has been completed Once the support plan has been completed and the risks defined it is important to support the individual to take the risks. This may involve discussing the risk assessment in depth with the individuals family.The individuals desired outcomes could conflict with those of carers, especially when the latter(prenominal) placed more emphasis on safety while the individual was prepared to accept a greater level of risk in order to maintain independence. Differences in attitudes to risk had to be tackled through good social work, to reinforce the individuals preferences while helping the family to distinguish between unconventional and flagitious behaviours. Another way of supporting the individual to take the risk in the first instance, could involve a trial run.An example could be where the individual wants to make an indepen dent instigate in to town using public transport.On the first trip you could accompany the individual on each tonus of the journey.On the second trip, you could accompany them to the town and then arrange to meet with them later in the day.On the third trip, you may just accompany them to the bus dispel. Gradually you can reduce the amount of support you provide. Another method of support could be to have a misfortune plan in case things dont quite go according to plan.If we look again at the last scenario, what would happen if the individual confused the last bus home? By ensuring they have a pre-arranged telephone number of their next of kin or carer they can make them aware of the problem. or else they may have the telephone number of the local mini cab office who would bring them home as an selection. It is also important that the individual knows what to do if things do go wrong. You can support them to take risks by ensuring they have clear information and advice about what to do if they have any concerns.For example they should be aware of and be able to recognise and identify abuse or neglect and know where and how they should seek help if necessary. Your support doesnt end once the risk assessment has been carried out. 4. review and revise the risk assessment with the individual After each risk assessment has been agreed it is important that it is monitored and reviewed in case any revisions are necessary. Risks may change as circumstances change, so they should be reviewed regularly. An assessment is a snapshot, whereas a risk assessment is an ongoing thing.Risk assessments should be reviewed periodically and whenever circumstances change to ensure they last out current. At the time the risk assessment is made it should include the signatures of everyone involved in the assessment and a review date should be place. It is important to review and revise risk assessments so that the success of the positive risk taking can be assessed and any ne cessary adjustments can be made. It may be necessary for the individual to have access to raise resources to enhance the plan or adaptations could be made to help the individual meet their planned outcomes.When positive risk-taking has a negative consequence, it is necessary to identify what has asleep(p) wrong and how the assessment and management of the risk contributed to this. ineluctably if we are supporting individuals to have more choice and control in their lives through positive approaches to managing risk, things are likely to go wrong from time to time. If this happens and the risk taken results in a negative outcome for the individual, there is no doubt that the risk taking process will come under interrogatory and the way in which this process worked to minimise the foreseeable risks will be considered.If the risks taken do not meet the planned outcomes for the individual then they may have to be reviewed and revised. 5. evaluate with the individual how taking the place risk has contributed to their well-being. Well-being describes the way we think and feel about ourselves and others, our confidence, and our ability to control things in our life. We all need to protect our wellbeing and this can be done by taking part in physical activity and having opportunities for relaxation and social activities. These can increase our resilience to cope with lifes difficulties and ability to enjoy life.You will need to evaluate, with the individual, how taking the identified risks has contributed to their well-being and quality of life. This will involve looking for at the positive and the negative consequences and outcomes of their choices. Has taking the risks met the individuals needs and achieved their desired outcomes. Taking the identified risks should result in the individual feeling empowered and having greater independence, control and a sense of due north about their lives. By supporting an individual to take positive risks, it can help them to evaluate alternative courses of action and can build confidence.The experience of failure, as a result of risk taking in a safe environment, can help to build resilience to setbacks and help individuals to manage risk better in the future.Outcome 6Understand duty of care in relation to supporting positive risk-taking 1. explain how the principle of duty of care can be maintained while supporting individuals to take risks Ultimately, you have a statutory duty of care and a responsibility not to agree to a support plan if there are serious concerns that it will not meet an individuals needs or if it places an individual in a austere situation.Whilst an individual can choose voluntarily to live with a level of risk and is entitled to do so (with the law treating that person as having consented to the risk) the local authority is not obliged to fund it. There is an important distinction between putting people at risk and enabling them to choose to take reasonable risks. Inevitably if we are supporting individuals to have more choice and control in their lives through positive risk taking, things may go wrong from time to time.A defensible decision is one where those involved in the risk assessing processUsed true assessment methodsActed responsibly in relation to their duty of careWere not negligentAssessed and took steps to manage and minimise foreseeable risksRecorded decisions and subsequently checked they were carried outFollowed policies, procedures and guidanceInvolved the person and other relevant people in the processSupported people to make informed decisionsIdentification of positive and negative risksInvolvement of people who use services and those who are important to them this includes people who form the individuals loose circle of support, who are involved from the beginning to gather information, define what the risks are from the individuals point of view and to discuss ways to enable and manage these risks. Positive and informed risk-taki ng this is built on a strengths-based approach to the person and looks at creative ways for people to be able to do things rather than ruling them out. Proportionality this means that the time and effort spent on managing a risk should match the severity of that risk.The approach should also explore the consequence of not taking the risk in question, such as tone ending of autonomy or restriction of choice. Contextualising behaviour this means knowing about the persons history and social environment, their previous experience of risk, what has and has not worked in previous situations. Defensible decision making this means recording a clear rationale for all the decisions made and the discussions that led to the decisions, including reference to relevant legislation such as the Mental Capacity Act or the Human Rights Act. A learning culture this require a commitment to ongoing learning and the use of brooding practice for people working at the frontline. Tolerable risks this involves negotiating and balancing issues of risk and safety to identify what is gratifying for everyone concerned (the individual and others including the community) on a case by case basis.2. describe what action to take if an individual decides to take an unplanned risk that places him/herself or others in neighboring(a) or imminent danger. imminent danger refers to any danger or dangerous condition that would not normally take place. If you think an individual is about to take an unplanned risk which will place them or others in immediate or imminent danger it is important to take appropriate corrective and preventative action and stop the activity immediately. An individual who is injuring himself/herself or is threatening physical harm to others may be restrained in an emergency to safeguard the individual and others. Risk assessments should include contingency measures that address risks arising from unplanned events. personal intervention isA method of responding to the c hallenging behaviour of people with a learning disability and/or autism, which involves some degree of direct physical force. Physical intervention may be the only course of action. Staff should be equipped with a range of skills to deal with and countermine potentially violent situations, as well as a range of restraint techniques that will allow for use of the minimum level of force possible. Physical intervention is only used in response to challenging behaviour and to restrict the movement and mobility of the person concerned.